Our clinker chemical composition is as follows: SiO2= 21 per cent; CaO= 64 per cent; Al2O3 = 6.0 per cent; Fe2O3= 5.2 ; K2O = 0.4 per cent; SO3 = 0.55 per cent; MgO =1.0 per cent; Free CaO = 1.0 per cent and the liquid = 34.5 per cent. Liter Wt 1380g/ l. If there is slight reduction in the liquid the clinker becomes dusty though the free CaO is under control. Here it seems the Al2O3 comes from limestone does not get into liquid though the calculated liquid is high.If slight reduction in Fe2O3 content results in dusty clinker. We add aluminous laterite and hematite ore as fluxes. The question is how to differentiate between the actual liquid and calculated liquid.Does the optical microscopy help in this regard? From your experience give a clear picture on how to reduce the liquid content with improved nodulisation and to have better refractory life in the burning zone. Even the Spinel bricks give only( refra mag-85 of refratecnik) six month's life.
admin
You are correct the theoretical liquid content of your clinker is very high. The litre weight is also high indicating a very dense (almost fused) clinker. Some Al2O3 will undoubtedly be taken into solid solution in the alite phase. Optical microscopy can indeed tell you the true liquid content (and the true alite, belite and free CaO content). There are photographic and computer pattern recognition systems available that will do this for you and eliminate the variation between microscopists. With regard to refractory life the liquid content and its properties are important. The viscosity of the flux is a critical consideration. Too fluid a flux can lead to dusting. These inter-relationships are very complex. To answer your questions properly would require a full and detailed process investigation involving microscopic analysis of frequent samples coupled with detailed process data over an extended period.
admin
Sometimes we need to produce special, low alkali clinker. In order to achieve good results we need to waste all dust from the kiln and to burn the kilnfeed harder than for the ordinary clinker. But in this case we are loosing almost all coating on the bricks. The questions: How and what could we change in our kilnfeed in order to protect the bricks even in case of low alkali clinker?
admin
I think you are operating long wet kilns? If so you could add some chloride to the kiln feed to promote the volatility of the alkalis in the kiln. That will drive more off from the clinker and result in lower alkali content at lower temperatures. However, that may increase your impact on the environment. I would need to know more about your process and situation before recommending that.