Ted Krapkat
537 posts
TimePosted 05/02/2015 02:24:24

re Clinker litre weight

Hello BLM,

Yes, high litre weight clinker would certainly tend to be harder to grind since the clinker is more dense. The same is generally true for clinker with low free lime.(<1%).

If you can't reduce clinker litre weight by softer burning, then you could try grinding the raw meal a bit coarser.

 

Regards,

Ted.

Reply


Know the answer to this question? Join the community and register for a free guest account to post a reply.

BLM
36 posts
TimePosted 05/02/2015 15:11:31
BLM says

re Clinker litre weight

Dear Ted,

Raw meal residues are allready heigher side I.e. 8 % on 212 mic and 27 % on 90 mic. If we increase further it may lead to increase back end temperatures due to poor heat transfer. Pl comment.

Reply

Ted Krapkat
537 posts
TimePosted 06/02/2015 04:45:55

re Clinker litre weight

Hello BLM,

The only other thing I can suggest is to reduce the liquid phase of the clinker, which will make the clinker more porous and harder to burn.

 

Regards,

Ted.

Reply

Touzet
3 posts
TimePosted 13/02/2015 17:42:21
Touzet says

re Clinker litre weight

Dear all:

If we lengthen the flame to move the clinker cooling zone into the kiln more, we will promote downsizing C3S crystals, thereby achieving ease of grinding.

Mario Touzet

 

 

 
Escribe texto o la dirección de un sitio web, o bien, traduce un documento.
 
 
If we lengthen the flame to move the clinker cooling zone into the furnace more, we will promote downsizing C3S crystals, thereby achieving ease of grinding.

Reply